Archive for February 6th, 2011

February 6, 2011

Case study on Laotians who are exiled around the world: Ronald Reagan’s first inaugural address

POLITICAL SYSTEM

Cached:  http://articles.cnn.com/2011-01-20/politics/reagan.inaugural_1_tax-burden-tax-system-national-history?_s=PM:POLITICS

January 20, 2011

As for the enemies of freedom, those who are potential adversaries, they will be reminded that peace is the highest aspiration of the American people. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it; we will not surrender for it, now or ever.

President-elect Ronald Reagan works on his inaugural address at home in California before his inauguration on January 20, 1981.

Sen. Hatfield, Mr. Chief Justice, Mr. President, Vice President Bush, Vice President Mondale, Senator Baker, Speaker O’Neill, Reverend Moomaw, and my fellow citizens:

To a few of us here today, this is a solemn and most momentous occasion, and yet in the history of our nation it is a commonplace occurrence. The orderly transfer of authority as called for in the Constitution routinely takes place, as it has for almost two centuries, and few of us stop to think how unique we really are. In the eyes of many in the world, this every-four-year ceremony we accept as normal is nothing less than a miracle.

Mr. President, I want our fellow citizens to know how much you did to carry on this tradition. By your gracious cooperation in the transition process, you have shown a watching world that we are a united people pledged to maintaining a political system which guarantees individual liberty to a greater degree than any other, and I thank you and your people for all your help in maintaining the continuity which is the bulwark of our republic.

The business of our nation goes forward. These United States are confronted with an economic affliction of great proportions. We suffer from the longest and one of the worst sustained inflations in our national history. It distorts our economic decisions, penalizes thrift, and crushes the struggling young and the fixed-income elderly alike. It threatens to shatter the lives of millions of our people.

Idle industries have cast workers into unemployment, human misery, and personal indignity. Those who do work are denied a fair return for their labor by a tax system which penalizes successful achievement and keeps us from maintaining full productivity.

But great as our tax burden is, it has not kept pace with public spending. For decades we have piled deficit upon deficit, mortgaging our future and our children’s future for the temporary convenience of the present. To continue this long trend is to guarantee tremendous social, cultural, political, and economic upheavals.

You and I, as individuals, can, by borrowing, live beyond our means, but for only a limited period of time. Why, then, should we think that collectively, as a nation, we’re not bound by that same limitation? We must act today in order to preserve tomorrow. And let there be no misunderstanding: We are going to begin to act, beginning today.

The economic ills we suffer have come upon us over several decades. They will not go away in days, weeks, or months, but they will go away. They will go away because we as Americans have the capacity now, as we’ve had in the past, to do whatever needs to be done to preserve this last and greatest bastion of freedom.

In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we’ve been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. The solutions we seek must be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a higher price.

We hear much of special interest groups. Well, our concern must be for a special interest group that has been too long neglected. It knows no sectional boundaries or ethnic and racial divisions, and it crosses political party lines. It is made up of men and women who raise our food, patrol our streets, man our mines and factories, teach our children, keep our homes, and heal us when we’re sick — professionals, industrialists, shopkeepers, clerks, cabbies, and truck drivers. They are, in short, “We the people,” this breed called Americans.

Well, this administration’s objective will be a healthy, vigorous, growing economy that provides equal opportunities for all Americans with no barriers born of bigotry or discrimination. Putting America back to work means putting all Americans back to work. Ending inflation means freeing all Americans from the terror of runaway living costs. All must share in the productive work of this “new beginning,” and all must share in the bounty of a revived economy. With the idealism and fair play which are the core of our system and our strength, we can have a strong and prosperous America, at peace with itself and the world.

So, as we begin, let us take inventory. We are a nation that has a government –not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the Earth. Our government has no power except that granted it by the people. It is time to check and reverse the growth of government, which shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the governed.

It is my intention to curb the size and influence of the federal establishment and to demand recognition of the distinction between the powers granted to the federal government and those reserved to the states or to the people. All of us need to be reminded that the federal government did not create the states; the states created the federal government.

Now, so there will be no misunderstanding, it’s not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work — work with us, not over us; to stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it.

If we look to the answer as to why for so many years we achieved so much, prospered as no other people on Earth, it was because here in this land we unleashed the energy and individual genius of man to a greater extent than has ever been done before. Freedom and the dignity of the individual have been more available and assured here than in any other place on Earth. The price for this freedom at times has been high, but we have never been unwilling to pay that price.

It is no coincidence that our present troubles parallel and are proportionate to the intervention and intrusion in our lives that result from unnecessary and excessive growth of government. It is time for us to realize that we’re too great a nation to limit ourselves to small dreams. We’re not, as some would have us believe, doomed to an inevitable decline. I do not believe in a fate that will fall on us no matter what we do. I do believe in a fate that will fall on us if we do nothing. So, with all the creative energy at our command, let us begin an era of national renewal. Let us renew our determination, our courage, and our strength. And let us renew our faith and our hope.

We have every right to dream heroic dreams. Those who say that we’re in a time when there are no heroes, they just don’t know where to look. You can see heroes every day going in and out of factory gates. Others, a handful in number, produce enough food to feed all of us and then the world beyond. You meet heroes across a counter, and they’re on both sides of that counter. There are entrepreneurs with faith in themselves and faith in an idea who create new jobs, new wealth and opportunity. They’re individuals and families whose taxes support the government and whose voluntary gifts support church, charity, culture, art, and education. Their patriotism is quiet, but deep. Their values sustain our national life.

Now, I have used the words “they” and “their” in speaking of these heroes. I could say “you” and “your,” because I’m addressing the heroes of whom I speak — you, the citizens of this blessed land. Your dreams, your hopes, your goals are going to be the dreams, the hopes, and the goals of this administration, so help me God.

We shall reflect the compassion that is so much a part of your makeup. How can we love our country and not love our countrymen; and loving them, reach out a hand when they fall, heal them when they’re sick, and provide opportunity to make them self-sufficient so they will be equal in fact and not just in theory?

Can we solve the problems confronting us? Well, the answer is an unequivocal and emphatic “yes.” To paraphrase Winston Churchill, I did not take the oath I’ve just taken with the intention of presiding over the dissolution of the world’s strongest economy.

In the days ahead I will propose removing the roadblocks that have slowed our economy and reduced productivity. Steps will be taken aimed at restoring the balance between the various levels of government. Progress may be slow, measured in inches and feet, not miles, but we will progress. It is time to reawaken this industrial giant, to get government back within its means, and to lighten our punitive tax burden. And these will be our first priorities, and on these principles there will be no compromise.

On the eve of our struggle for independence, a man who might have been one of the greatest among the Founding Fathers, Dr. Joseph Warren, president of the Massachusetts Congress, said to his fellow Americans, “Our country is in danger, but not to be despaired of. … On you depend the fortunes of America. You are to decide the important questions upon which rests the happiness and the liberty of millions yet unborn. Act worthy of yourselves.”

Well, I believe we, the Americans of today, are ready to act worthy of ourselves, ready to do what must be done to ensure happiness and liberty for ourselves, our children, and our children’s children. And as we renew ourselves here in our own land, we will be seen as having greater strength throughout the world. We will again be the exemplar of freedom and a beacon of hope for those who do not now have freedom.

To those neighbors and allies who share our freedom, we will strengthen our historic ties and assure them of our support and firm commitment. We will match loyalty with loyalty. We will strive for mutually beneficial relations. We will not use our friendship to impose on their sovereignty, for our own sovereignty is not for sale.

As for the enemies of freedom, those who are potential adversaries, they will be reminded that peace is the highest aspiration of the American people. We will negotiate for it, sacrifice for it; we will not surrender for it, now or ever.

Our forbearance should never be misunderstood. Our reluctance for conflict should not be misjudged as a failure of will. When action is required to preserve our national security, we will act. We will maintain sufficient strength to prevail if need be, knowing that if we do so we have the best chance of never having to use that strength.

Above all, we must realize that no arsenal or no weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today’s world do not have. It is a weapon that we as Americans do have. Let that be understood by those who practice terrorism and prey upon their neighbors.

I’m told that tens of thousands of prayer meetings are being held on this day, and for that I’m deeply grateful. We are a nation under God, and I believe God intended for us to be free. It would be fitting and good, I think, if on each Inaugural Day in future years it should be declared a day of prayer.

This is the first time in our history that this ceremony has been held, as you’ve been told, on this West Front of the Capitol. Standing here, one faces a magnificent vista, opening up on this city’s special beauty and history. At the end of this open mall are those shrines to the giants on whose shoulders we stand.

Directly in front of me, the monument to a monumental man, George Washington, father of our country. A man of humility who came to greatness reluctantly. He led America out of revolutionary victory into infant nationhood. Off to one side, the stately memorial to Thomas Jefferson. The Declaration of Independence flames with his eloquence. And then, beyond the Reflecting Pool, the dignified columns of the Lincoln Memorial. Whoever would understand in his heart the meaning of America will find it in the life of Abraham Lincoln.

Beyond those monuments to heroism is the Potomac River, and on the far shore the sloping hills of Arlington National Cemetery, with its row upon row of simple white markers bearing crosses or Stars of David. They add up to only a tiny fraction of the price that has been paid for our freedom.

Each one of those markers is a monument to the kind of hero I spoke of earlier. Their lives ended in places called Belleau Wood, The Argonne, Omaha Beach, Salerno, and halfway around the world on Guadalcanal, Tarawa, Pork Chop Hill, the Chosin Reservoir, and in a hundred rice paddies and jungles of a place called Vietnam.

Under one such marker lies a young man, Martin Treptow, who left his job in a small town barbershop in 1917 to go to France with the famed Rainbow Division. There, on the western front, he was killed trying to carry a message between battalions under heavy artillery fire.

We’re told that on his body was found a diary. On the flyleaf under the heading, “My Pledge,” he had written these words: “America must win this war. Therefore I will work, I will save, I will sacrifice, I will endure, I will fight cheerfully and do my utmost, as if the issue of the whole struggle depended on me alone.”

The crisis we are facing today does not require of us the kind of sacrifice that Martin Treptow and so many thousands of others were called upon to make. It does require, however, our best effort and our willingness to believe in ourselves and to believe in our capacity to perform great deeds, to believe that together with God’s help we can and will resolve the problems which now confront us.

And after all, why shouldn’t we believe that? We are Americans.

God bless you, and thank you.

Happy 100th Birthday, Ronald Reagan

Wall Street Journal (blog)
By WSJ Staff Coinciding with Super Bowl Sunday is what would have been the 100th birthday of former president Ronald Reagan. As such, a two-minute tribute
February 6, 2011

Laos general’s backers appeal over US burial snub

By Michael Thurston (AFP)

Members of the Hmong community react after viewing the open casket General Vang Pao. 2/4/2011

FRESNO, California — Backers of Laotian general Vang Pao appealed to US President Barack Obama to let him be buried with honors at Arlington National Cemetery, after the US military rejected their request.

The call came on the second day of a traditional six-day funeral for the 81-year-old general — who led a CIA-backed “secret army” helping the US during the Vietnam war — in Fresno, California, where he died last month.

Thousands of ethnic Hmong from the US and overseas have gathered to pay their last respects, but ceremonies have been clouded by the decision to refuse Vang Pao an Arlington burial, announced as the funeral started Friday.

“We were very disappointed to hear that the request for the burial of General Vang Pao has been denied,” said the Memorial Central Committee organizing the Hmong veteran’s funeral.

“We hope President Obama and the defense secretary will allow a burial waiver for General Vang Pao,” it added in a statement issued on behalf of “Vang Pao?s family, Hmong Americans, Vietnam war veterans and friends.”

Charlie Waters, a friend of the late general, said that Senator John McCain, a Vietnam veteran himself, would see Vice-President Joe Biden on Monday to press him on Vang Pao’s case.

“We’re not buying the idea that Arlington is becoming full. There’s space for a hero,” said Korean war veteran Waters, adding that he would offer to give his own place in Arlington to Vang Pao.

Vang Pao led the Central Intelligence Agency-backed force that assisted the United States in Vietnam, during its ill-fated war with communist forces in the north of southeast Asian nation.

He died of pneumonia on January 6 in Fresno, one of the major hubs of the 250,000-strong Hmong community living in the United States, some 30-40,000 of whom live in the west coast state of California.

His family and supporters had applied to the US military for a waiver to allow Vang Pao to be buried at Arlington, normally reserved for American veterans.

On Friday the Pentagon said the family’s Arlington request “was thoroughly reviewed by a board comprised of senior military and civilian officials” but it “unanimously recommended denial of the request for exception to policy.”

But the memorial committee said general Vang Pao served the United States valiantly. “His exceptional service symbolizes the death of each soldier,” the statement said.

“We strongly believe the right thing to do is to honor his contributions to the United States. He fought to protect America?s freedom, democracy, and justice.”

It cited precedents including Iraqi Air Force captain Ali Hussam, killed in the Iraq war. “There are many others. General Vang Pao has contributed directly to the US military and deserves to be laid to rest at Arlington,” it said.

One of Vang Pao’s sons, 46-year-old Chai Vang, said he believed the Arlington decision could be reversed.

“As far as the family, we’re really upset. He put his life and all of his efforts towards democracy in Laos,” he told AFP before the appeal was issued, adding: “Anything can be reversed.

Vang Pao, a fierce opponent of the communist government in Vientiane, was also a controversial figure.

In 2007, he was arrested in California on charges of plotting to overthrow a foreign government after an undercover agent tried to sell him weapons at a Thai restaurant.

Prosecutors dropped their charges in 2009. A judge later ended the case for the remaining 11 Hmong Americans accused in the case amid persistent questions over the government’s evidence.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Related articles

February 6, 2011

Reagan centennial stirs GOP to look back, ahead

Cached:  http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/02/04/MNVT1HF6KG.DTL&type=politics

Carla Marinucci, Chronicle Political Writer

San Francisco Chronicle February 4, 2011 04:00 AM

Friday, February 4, 2011

Ronald Reagan takes the oath of office as California's 33rd governor on Jan. 2, 1967.

As Republicans mark the 100th anniversary of Ronald Reagan’s birth Sunday, a nostalgic GOP confronts a nagging question: Can the party of the former president and California governor hope to produce future leaders who can meet his iconic political gold standard?

“Reagan is still the lodestar for Republicans,” said Sacramento political consultant Sal Russo, a UC Berkeley student activist in 1964 when he was tapped to be a driver, and later a special assistant, to Reagan when he was California’s governor from 1967 to 1975. “You can’t have a conversation about Republican politics without bringing him up.”

Russo – now a leading force behind the Tea Party Express, which is creating a populist firestorm in GOP politics – said Reagan’s legacy provides a template for Republicans who hope to gain ground, and even win back the White House, in 2012.

“Reagan understood political reality, and his positions evolved – and there’s nothing wrong with that,” Russo said. “Both political parties have a tendency to get a little insular.” Moving beyond isolation, he said, is “what Reagan did – both in California and the rest of the country.”

Learn from the past

As his centennial approaches, Californians who worked alongside him and journalists who covered him say the life of America’s 40th president and his remarkable political career hold key lessons for the state he governed and the party he led.

But it presents challenges: With the 2012 presidential elections looming, the question of what constitutes “post-Reaganism” – and who is likely to best represent it – is daunting for the Republican Party on the brink of one of its most wide-open presidential primaries in decades.

Lacking an obvious front-runner or even a candidate who is assumed to be first in line for the nomination, party donors and leaders probably will gravitate toward a candidate who can conjure some of the winning Reagan magic – critical against Democratic President Obama.

But those who have studied Reagan say he’s a tough act to follow – especially when a weak economy and extraordinary political vitriol have roiled the political landscape.

“It’s one thing to talk about Reagan, but what Reagan did was more practical and mainstream than what most people remember,” said journalist Lou Cannon, the Reagan biographer who has penned five books on the former president, who died in 2004.

Not a chance today

As governor, Reagan raised taxes in California, while as president, “Reagan’s greatest legacy is that he started a reduction of nuclear armaments with (Soviet leader Mikhail) Gorbachev,” said Cannon.

“Can you imagine a Republican Party nominating someone who was ready to raise taxes and wanted that reduction? That person wouldn’t get out of the Iowa primary,” he said.

For a new generation of Republicans, Reagan remains the role model not only as “the great communicator” but also as “the great educator,” said Republican attorney and veteran party strategist Ken Khachigian, who served as Reagan’s chief speechwriter during the presidential campaigns of 1980 and 1984.

“He laid down a set of principles, not just as president but even before that – principles that define the Republican Party: a strong America, a strong defense, less government regulation, reasonable or lower taxation,” said Khachigian.

But his greatest strength was his presentation of ideas, Khachigian said.

“He knew how to create word pictures and paint portraits in people’s minds of what he was trying to tell them,” Khachigian said, like the “shining city on the hill” – the phrase Reagan used to describe what he called America’s special place in the world. “When you add that together with his voice, and the way he presented himself, the boyish quality … he had a very familiar and easy visage,” said Khachigian. Reagan’s harshest critics often found themselves frustrated, Khachigian said, because “he could give a tough speech and never look tough and threatening.”

Reagan Energy Secretary John Herrington, a former chairman of the California GOP, said presidential candidates hoping to follow in Reagan’s footsteps must learn the lesson of authenticity.

“He was the same guy in private as in public,” said Herrington, who met Reagan in June 1968 when he began work as an advance man for the then-governor’s first campaign for the GOP presidential nomination.

Reagan “tapped into a lot of principles that the rank and file believed in, and he was able to bring pride back to the office,” said Herrington. “As a leader, he made you proud.”

No modern version

Insiders say it is still unclear who among the current crop of GOP hopefuls, in California and on the national scene, can easily assume that mantle.

“I think one of the reasons the Tea Party Express has been most successful is that we employ a lot of lessons I learned from him,” said Russo, whose movement has helped bring politicians such as the often-divisive Rep. Michele Bachman of Minnesota and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to the GOP fore.

But Khachigian warned that “it’s been a long stretch” since Reagan was able to attract large swaths of Democrats, labor and independents into the GOP camp – and that’s part of the challenge.

The GOP, he said, cannot only look back – it needs to look forward to leaders who can provide, like Reagan, a guiding light for Republican values.

“Someone will come along who has that gift,” he said, “but it does set a very high bar for others.”

E-mail Carla Marinucci at cmarinucci@sfchronicle.com.

Tags:
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 232 other followers

%d bloggers like this: