Archive for December 3rd, 2011

December 3, 2011

Please sign the petition urging the governments of Laos and Thailand to cancel the Xayaburi Dam

Dear Friends,

Over the past seven years, the majority of my time in the Mekong region has been spent in great awe of the Mekong River and the life, beauty and culture it supports. It’s a river of plenty – the Giant Mekong Catfish, mythical nagas that spew fireballs, and the endless green fields of rice that thrive off the river’s nourishment.

But the Mekong River and the millions of people it supports are now in jeopardy. In the next few months, regional governments will make a decision about whether to proceed with plans to build the Xayaburi Dam in northern Laos, the first of 11 dams planned for the Lower Mekong Mainstream.

In April, regional governments delayed a decision on the Xayaburi Dam, largely because of the huge public opposition from throughout the region and the world.

It’s critical that we again make our voices heard.

In the past few months Laos has been working hard to push the Xayaburi Dam forward, and illegal construction on access roads and work camps is continuing.

A healthy Mekong River is vital to the lives of millions in the Mekong Region. If the Xayaburi Dam is built it would open the floodgates for other Mainstream dams, which would irreversibly alter the entire river ecosystem.

We must act now to protect this vital lifesource for present and future generations. Please sign the petition urging the governments of Laos and Thailand to cancel the Xayaburi Dam.

For the Mekong and the millions that depend on it,

Ame Trandem,
Southeast Asia Program Director

International Rivers
2150 Allston Way, Suite 300, Berkeley, CA 94704 USA
Tel.: +1 510 848 1155
www.internationalrivers.org

We must act now to protect this vital life source for present and future generations.

Please sign the petition below urging the governments of Laos and Thailand to cancel the Xayaburi Dam. Every additional signature makes the movement stronger.
Read the petition in: Khmer, Thai, Vietnamese and Lao

Sign the Petition


Help Protect The Mekong River and the people who depend on it

December 3, 2011

Power from Xayaburi Not Needed in Thailand

 

For immediate release

December 3, 2011

Media Contacts:
Chuenchom Sangarasri Greacen, +66 817 733 788, chomsgreacen@gmail.com
Pianporn Deetes, International Rivers, +66 814 220 111, pai@internationalrivers.org

Power from Xayaburi Not Needed in Thailand

Alternative Plan shows Thailand can meet future energy needs with cheaper, cleaner options

Bangkok, Thailand: An Alternative Power Development Plan for Thailand released today shows that Thailand can meet its future energy needs without any additional hydropower imports, and without additional investments in coal or nuclear energy. The plan shows that power from the Xayaburi Dam on the Mekong River is not needed to meet Thailand’s future energy needs, and that investment in energy efficiency, renewables and co-generation could lower electricity bills for consumers by 12% by 2030 and avoid investment of US$67 billion (2 trillion baht).

“This study shows that the Thai government is selling its citizens down the river in deals with the Lao government that are not in the best interests of electricity consumers. Not only is power from the Xayaburi Dam not needed to meet our future energy needs, but it will be more expensive than alternative options. A smart energy future is urgently needed.  The Thai government should immediately cancel its commitment to buy power from Xayaburi and other Mekong Mainstream Dams and adopt a transparent and participatory process for determining future energy needs,” said Pianporn Deetes, Thailand Campaign Coordinator for International Rivers.

The Alternative Power Development Plan (PDP) was produced by Thai energy experts Chuenchom Sangarasri Greacen and Dr. Chris Greacen. The team analyzed the Thai government’s current Power Development Plan (PDP 2010) and found that future power demand was overestimated by 13,200 megawatts (MW) over the next 20 years, the equivalent of 10 Xayaburi Dams. The authors also found that Thailand has sufficient excess surplus capacity and projects in the pipeline such that no additional power plants or energy efficiency measures are needed until 2017.

“Thailand’s current power sector planning process has significant shortcomings. A more sensible approach to forecasting future demand, coupled with investment in cleaner and cheaper energy options, would not only result in cheaper electricity bills for consumers, but would also reduce Thailand’s emissions of greenhouse gases and other harmful pollutants. Environmentally destructive projects like Mekong Mainstream Dams, coal and nuclear plants are simply not needed for Thailand,” said Chuenchom Sangarasri Greacen, one of the report’s authors.

The report authors came up with a more realistic demand forecast for 2030 by looking at historical trends over the past 25 years. They found that over the past 20 years, the Thai government’s official electricity demand forecasts have consistently over-estimated future power demand, resulting in unnecessary investment and higher bills for consumers. After the demand forecast reduction, the authors found that the power sector still needs an additional 14,387 MW of power by 2030 in order to maintain a 15% reserve margin.  The generation sources included in the Alternative PDP are as follows:

  • Projects already under construction and planned renewables and cogeneration are included. This does not include Xayaburi or any other additional imported hydropower.
  • Energy efficiency and demand side management at levels consistent with the Thai Government’s 20-year Energy Efficiency Plan– equivalent to savings of 20% of total electricity consumption.
  • 4,800 MW of high efficiency gas-fired cogeneration. A cogeneration plant utilizes not only the electricity but also the generated heat in industrial or commercial applications, thereby significantly increasing the plant’s efficiency. In contrast, the heat produced in a centralized power plant is typically wasted through cooling towers.
  • Extending the plant life for some existing power plants.

The authors found that the Alternative PDP would result in reductions in carbon dioxide emissions on a per-capita basis of 7.7% in year 2030 compared with a per-capita increase of 75% under the PDP 2010.

“Thailand’s Power Development Plan (PDP) illustrates a planning process in crisis, out of touch with historic trends in electricity demand and prescribing far too many power plants of the wrong types,” says Chuenchom Sangarasri Greacen. “The current PDP should be revised and the process for developing the plan amended to include broader criteria and accountability to the government’s energy policy objectives.  Otherwise Thai citizens could be wasting $3.4 billion a year in investments that are neither desirable nor necessary.”

More information:
Summary of the Alternative Power Development Plan for Thailand

Media Kit on Xayaburi Dam

–30–

 

International Rivers is an environmental and human rights organization with staff in four continents. For over two decades, International Rivers has been at the heart of the global struggle to protect rivers and the rights of communities that depend on them.

2150 Allston Way, Suite 300, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
Tel: +1 510 848 1155 | Fax: +1 510 848 1008 | info@internationalrivers.org | www.internationalrivers.org

December 3, 2011

Formerly Outlaws, Now Artists of Renown

Click on the link to get more news and video from original source:  http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/02/us/formerly-graffiti-outlaws-now-artists-of-renown.html?_r=1

Chicago News Cooperative

Formerly Outlaws, Now Artists of Renown

A Hmong rebel in Laos begs for help from the outside world in a photograph by KC Ortiz.

By MERIBAH KNIGHT

Published: December 2, 2011

Before they were in, they were out. Before crowds swamped the galleries and celebrities wrote checks, KC Ortiz and Jordan Nickel wielded spray cans, hopped fences, provoked the citizenry, got arrested — all to make Chicago’s streets, rooftops and el tracks their canvas.

Chicago News CooperativeA nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization providing local coverage of Chicago and the surrounding area for The New York Times.

More From the Chicago News Cooperative »

Graffiti is a “selfish, stupid, destructive crime,” declared former Mayor Richard M. Daley. Still, the pair thrived — first as criminals, and eventually as artists.

“Graffiti was the best education,” said Mr. Ortiz, 33, now an award-winning photojournalist. His work has appeared in Newsweek, Time and The Wall Street Journal. “I learned to listen to myself and get around barriers that other people set up against you.”

Mr. Nickel, 31, now a painter and founder of We Are Supervision, a commercial art and design firm based in Chicago, said, “Riding the train as a kid and seeing graffiti was life-changing.” The times he spent traveling the Red Line with his father from their Evanston home to see the Cubs at Wrigley Field revealed “a world that invited me in and accepted me and made me who I am,” he said. “It completely electrified my life.”

If Mr. Nickel had the opportunity, he would tell Mr. Daley: “Lighten up. If I didn’t have that outlet as a kid, I wouldn’t be sitting here. Graffiti saved my life.”

Mr. Nickel and Mr. Ortiz’s exhibition inspired by Chicago’s strict stance on graffiti, entitled “Whitewash,” opened Nov. 19 at Known Gallery in Los Angeles.

And while they are frequently invited to teach art and show their work around the world, Mr. Ortiz and Mr. Nickel have never shown in Chicago, the city that they say made them.

“Graffiti just demands so much of its participants, in terms of work ethic and to stand out in terms of talent and quality,” said Caleb Neelon, co-author of “The History of American Graffiti” (HarperCollins). “To apply those quantity and quality ethics to any chosen field gives good results.”

Mr. Nickel, who goes by the name POSE in both graffiti and fine art, started writing graffiti when he was 12, lured by the colorful letters he saw on rooftops and brick walls. Eventually he went on to art school at the Kansas City Art Institute and dabbled in performance art and conceptual work.

After a few years making art that was separate from his graffiti, Mr. Nickel said, he “realized it was not working anymore.”

“I was denying that graffiti part of me,” he said.

He incorporates graffiti into his newer paintings. His canvases bear splatters, patches, bandages, and marks of paint removal that are known as the buff — all posing the question of what it means to simply paint over graffiti.

“The buff is just a Band-Aid,” Mr. Nickel said. The human problems that came before graffiti — gangs and poverty — remain even after the graffiti is blasted away, he added.

For Mr. Ortiz, finding his way from graffiti to photography was part of his own evolution.

At 21, Mr. Ortiz was sentenced to five and a half years in federal prison for a drug conspiracy conviction. In prison, before ever picking up a camera, Mr. Ortiz found photography. He spent years poring over newspapers and magazines, studying composition and technique.

Listening to inmates grumble about their conditions, he said he thought about their three square meals a day, and the people around the world who were hungry.

“I came out with a totally fresh perspective on life,” Mr. Ortiz said. “I looked at it like I had died and I was being born again. I went through a first-world problem and wanted to help those who had real problems.”

Over the past three years, Mr. Ortiz has traveled around the globe, pointing his lens toward people the world may have forgotten.

“KC is one of the individuals in my life who I’ve seen transform for the better and transform other people around him for the better more than anyone I’ve ever known,” said Pete Wentz, the lead singer for Fall Out Boy and a longtime friend and collector.

Mr. Ortiz spent months in the jungles of Laos with the Hmong people, who after being recruited in the 1960s by the Central Intelligence Agency to fight Communists in the “secret war,” are still engaged in combat with the Vietnamese nearly 40 years after the United States withdrew from the region.

“It’s all about patience,” Mr. Ortiz said of his projects. “I definitely learned about patience in prison. I can outwait anyone. I can sit anywhere. I can sleep anywhere. Prison built me for that.”

Mr. Ortiz’s work in Laos won him a first-place award for a feature in the prestigious Pictures of the Year International competition. His recent work is from West Papua and Myanmar, where he spent time with opposition forces and rebels.

“You would never think that a graffiti writer would be in the jungles of Burma,” said Casey Zoltan, director of Known Gallery. “But that is what made him a graffiti writer in the first place — to take that next step, to take it to the next level.”

For both Mr. Ortiz and Mr. Nickel there is no clear line between where graffiti ended and fine art began.

“Yes, graffiti is bad and wild,” Mr. Nickel said. “But it’s also just paint.”

mknight@chicagonewscoop.org

A version of this article appeared in print on December 2, 2011, on page A25A of the National edition with the headline: Formerly Outlaws, Now Artists Of Renown.

December 3, 2011

20,000 People Call on Mekong Govts to Cancel Xayaburi Dam

For immediate release

November 30, 2011

Media Contacts:
Pianporn Deetes, Thailand Campaign Coordinator, International Rivers, +66 81 422 0111, pai@internationalrivers.org
Sor.Rattanamanee Polkla, Lawyer for the Community Resources Centre, +66 81 772 5843
Ame Trandem, Southeast Asia Program Director, International Rivers, +855 92 569 113, ame@internationalrivers.org

More Than 20,000 People Call on Mekong Governments to Cancel the Xayaburi Dam

U.S. Senate Committee Calls for Delay in Xayaburi Dam

Bangkok, Thailand – 22,589 people from 106 countries submitted an international petition today to the Prime Ministers of Laos and Thailand, calling for cancellation of the proposed Xayaburi Dam on the Mekong River in Northern Laos. The petition comes one week before the four Mekong governments meet on December 8th in Siem Reap, Cambodia, where they are likely to decide whether to proceed with the project.

The Xayaburi Dam is the first of eleven dams proposed for the Lower Mekong River. The petition expresses grave concern about the future of the Lower Mekong Basin, and urges the Prime Ministers to cancel the project and defer all decisions on Mekong dams for a period of at least ten years, until further studies can be conducted. The petition was presented to Thailand’s Government House and the Lao Embassy in Bangkok on Wednesday.

“The people of Southeast Asia and concerned citizens around the world have once again voiced their opposition to the Xayaburi Dam,” said Pianporn Deetes, Thailand Campaign Coordinator for International Rivers. “The whole world is watching. We do not want to remember December 8th as the day the Mekong died.”

The petition comes a day after the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously approved a resolution by Senator Jim Webb calling for the protection of the Mekong River Basin and for delaying mainstream dam construction along the river. The resolution calls for the U.S. Government to allocate more funding to help identify sustainable alternatives to mainstream hydropower dams and to analyze the impacts of proposed development along the river.

“The Committee’s adoption of this resolution sends a timely signal of U.S. support for the Mekong River Commission’s efforts to preserve the ecological and economic stability of Southeast Asia,” Senator Webb, chair of the Senate East Asian and Pacific Affairs Subcommittee, said in a statement. “The United States and the global community have a strategic interest in preserving the health and well-being of the more than 60 million people who depend on the Mekong River.”

Although Laos is proposing the dam, Thailand is also playing a key role as investor, project developer, and purchaser of 95% of the dam’s electricity. The petition calls on the government of Thailand to cancel its plans to purchase electricity from the Xayaburi Dam and any other Mekong Mainstream Dams.

“Laos has a duty under international law to provide enough information about the regional impacts of the Xayaburi project to allow its neighbors to make an informed decision, but it has yet to do so,” said Sor.Rattanamanee Polkla, a lawyer for the Community Resources Centre in Thailand and a member of Mekong Legal Network. “Moreover, Thailand, as the primary beneficiary of the dam, should be equally responsible for providing more information about the project’s impacts. Under international best practice, Thailand should assess all energy options before deciding to dam a river of such importance for millions of people’s livelihoods, in line with the recommendations of the Strategic Environmental Assessment sponsored by the Mekong River Commission.”

“Through this petition, the international community has spoken out against the Xayaburi Dam as this is a river of global significance,” said Guadalupe Rodriguez, a member of the German-based organization Rettet den Regenwald (Rainforest Rescue), and one of the sponsors of the petition. “We cannot allow a privileged few to trade away the biodiversity and ecosystems that feed millions, as it would spark tension in the region.”

At a meeting in April, the governments of Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam raised concerns about the Xayaburi Dam’s transboundary impacts and recommended further study and public consultations. The four governments could not agree on a solution, and elevated the decision to a ministerial meeting now scheduled for December 7-8.

More information:

–30–

International Rivers is an environmental and human rights organization with staff in four continents. For over two decades, International Rivers has been at the heart of the global struggle to protect rivers and the rights of communities that depend on them.

2150 Allston Way, Suite 300, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
Tel: +1 510 848 1155 | Fax: +1 510 848 1008 | info@internationalrivers.org | www.internationalrivers.org